ACI Europe has said that it “very much regrets” the recent speculation and media coverage about a possible extension of the USA’s ban on laptops – “not least, because it reveals a lack of meaningful security cooperation between the EU and the USA. This is not conducive to effective security and potentially compromises trust in the aviation security system.”
“The past days have seen much speculation and media coverage over a possible extension by the USA of its current ban on the carriage of large personal electronic devices (PEDs) aboard US-bound flights departing from selected Middle East and North African airports to US-bound flights departing from an unspecified number of European airports.
“Following a letter sent to the USA on 9th May by EU Commissioners Violeta Bulc and Dimitris Avramopoulos calling for a common approach and subsequent bilateral contacts, a meeting will finally take place tomorrow (Wednesday 17th May) in Brussels between the US Department for Homeland Security and the European Commission.
“Ahead of this meeting, ACI Europe is issuing a warning about the highly disruptive and far-reaching consequences that a ban on the carriage of PEDs aboard US-bound flights from European airports would have. Fifty-nine airports in the European Common Aviation Area* currently have direct services to the USA, with a total of 3,684 weekly flights being operated.
“The five airports with the largest number of US weekly flights are London-Heathrow (761 flights), Paris-Charles de Gaulle (353 flights), Frankfurt (291 flights), Amsterdam-Schiphol (242 flights), and Dublin (179 flights). Together, these five airports account for nearly 50% of the weekly flights to the USA. Based on a sample of European airports, the number of passengers carrying PEDs is estimated to be between 60% and 90%.
“Given the volumes involved, extending the current US ban to European airports would result in significant disruptions, with implications on various aspects on airport and airline operations. Among these would be ad hoc screening checks at the gate of each flight, as well as the implementation of related processes to load PEDs into the hold of aircraft. This would require the deployment of a very large number of additional security staff. Appropriate staff are not readily available and would need to be trained. Also, as for anyone working in the restricted area of a European airport, new staff would need to first obtain security clearance from the competent national authorities – a process that usually takes several weeks.
“Affected airports would also need to reconsider their gate allocation system – with the objective of re-grouping US-bound flights within ‘common gate areas’, where possible. In addition to the extended boarding processing times involved by the extra screening, this would generate inefficiencies in infrastructure capacity utilisation, with potentially spill-over effects on other flights.”
“Olivier Jankovec, Director General, ACI Europe, said: “All in all, if the ban was to go ahead, it would hit the continent’s busiest airports hardest, where a significant portion of US-bound flights would need to be cancelled at short notice. For the flights that could still operate there would be delays, which would compromise onward connections in the USA.
“Beyond the immediate operational impact, we are concerned about the consequences that such a ban would have on demand for transatlantic air travel – and ultimately connectivity between Europe and the USA. The fact that one of the affected Gulf airlines has downsized its operations to the USA is indeed worrying – and points to a wider and lasting economic impact.”
Time to Reset EU-US Co-Operation on Security
ACI Europe is calling on the USA and the EU to share between themselves all information in their possession, to jointly review the threat which led to the initial US ban, and carefully consider whether any additional security measures are needed for US-bound flights departing from European airports. Should any such measures be considered, these should be purely risk-based – which means that they need to be credible, proportionate and effective to address whatever threat they are supposed to address.
Olivier Jankovec added: “Tomorrow’s meeting should be the opportunity for the EU and the USA to reset their co-operation on aviation security. More than ever, given the geopolitical environment we are in, we need the EU and the USA to work hand-in-hand on this. This is what the travelling public – and citizens – rightly expect from their Governments, as it is the only way to stand a chance of defeating terrorism.”
* The European Common Aviation Area includes the EU-28, Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania, Kosovo and FYROM (Macedonia).